Key considerations for delivering best value in the small building works portfolio of large client organizations

Griffith, A (2007) Key considerations for delivering best value in the small building works portfolio of large client organizations. Construction Management and Economics, 25(8), pp. 903-909. ISSN 1466433X

Abstract

Many large organizations own and occupy extensive, complex and aried property estates, which are essential to their business. Continued reliance on these resources often requires considerable annual expenditure on maintenance, alterations, refurbishment and small-scale new building works. Such activities form the category small building works, a sub-sector of the UK construction industry which currently approximates to £11 billion, or 20% of annual total output. The delivery of best value in the management of small building works, in the context of an organization with a large property portfolio, is important to the business. Studies into small building works conducted over the past 15 years have been synthesized and augmented to highlight the key considerations for ensuring best value in small building works. The delivery of best value requires a comprehensive understanding of the proposed works themselves and then the potential impact of those works upon the property portfolio, and all within the context of the organization's business activities. Clients need to establish first, an effective procurement approach and second, an effective operational approach.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: operations; procurement; property estates; small building works; workload management
Index terms: client organization, workload, construction industry, best value
Subjects: bidding, client relations, industry analysis, management
Topics: Human Resources, Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 2 CT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here