Risk under performance-based contracting in the UK construction sector

Gruneberg, S L; Hughes, W P and Ancell, D J (2007) Risk under performance-based contracting in the UK construction sector. Construction Management and Economics, 25(7), pp. 691-699. ISSN 1466433X

Abstract

As a method of procuring the services of the built environment, performance-based contracting (PBC) seeks to link the building supplier to longer term commitments than has traditionally been the case in the construction sector. By rewarding the building producer according to the way that building or structure delivers the users' requirements, rather than according to a list of assembled parts, a number of additional risks are taken by contractors, including fitness for purpose, costs and briefing. The extent to which contractors recognize these risks and their methods of dealing with them vary considerably and are influenced by their attitudes towards risk. As the risks associated with PBC are seen as large, uninsurable, and vulnerable to changing client requirements, the majority of respondents would reject the use of PBC as a method of contracting. Nevertheless, PBC may be used under particular conditions, where rewards are deemed sufficient to compensate for the additional risk to the contractor of undertaking work on the basis of a stream of payments paid over the life of a structure depending on the satisfactory performance of the building or as part of a private finance initiative.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: performance-based contracting; private finance initiative; risk management
Index terms: client requirements, built environment, risk management, private finance initiative, stream, performance-based, briefing, construction sector, commitment
Subjects: psychology, contractual arrangements, risk assessment, scope management, infrastructure and transport systems, industry analysis, performance measurement, professional development, water management
Topics: Risk Management, Procurement, Sustainability, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Organizational Design, Urban Studies, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here