Ive, G and Chang, C Y (2007) The principle of inconsistent trinity in the selection of procurement systems. Construction Management and Economics, 25(7), pp. 677-690. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
This paper examines the economic characteristics of construction procurement systems partially in terms of transaction cost economics and partly those of project management. It proposes the theoretical principle of an inconsistent trinity, according to which, in selecting a procurement system, the client will inevitably face a trade-off between the procurement system best able to deliver: (1) fastest completion of the project (and therefore higher discounted present value of revenue from the project); (2) least vulnerability when making changes (lower transaction hold-up costs arising from temporal or process specificity); as well as (3) least vulnerability to non-performance (lower transaction measurement costs from greater visibility to third parties for ordering of disputes). The model provides a potentially testable contribution to a transaction cost theory of construction procurement. It also has two implications: (1) the three main family types of procurement systems are held to be intrinsically different in economic terms, so selection of procurement system does matter; (2) no system can enjoy absolute advantage over others, so the proposed strategy of procurement system selection is to align the characteristics of procurement systems with attributes of projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | hold-up; measurement costs; opportunism; procurement system; temporal specificity; transaction costs |
| Index terms: | construction procurement, dispute, revenue, face, opportunism, project management, procurement system, strategy, vulnerability, transaction cost |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, environmental hazards, management, business, project management theory and practice, psychology, economic analysis, dispute resolution, financial analysis |
| Topics: | Procurement, Business Strategy, Legal Issues, Sustainability, Cost Management, Project Management, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here