Jha, K N and Misra, S (2007) Ranking and classification of construction coordination activities in Indian projects. Construction Management and Economics, 25(4), pp. 409-421. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
The efforts of contractors, consultants and owners need to be appropriately coordinated in large civil engineering projects, whose success can be defined in terms of compliance to schedule, economy in cost, adherence to quality, and non-occurrence of disputes. Based on the hypothesis that coordination activities affect the different dimensions of project success differently, and that different stakeholders prioritize the activities differently, a questionnaire survey covering senior Indian construction professionals was carried out. For this a list of 59 coordination activities influencing successful completion of a construction project was drawn up. These coordination activities were ranked for the four success dimensions using statistical tools on the responses received. 'Regular monitoring of critical path activities'; 'monitoring the budget on all activities and taking corrective action'; 'application of sound technical practices'; 'implementation of all contractual commitments' are the most important coordination activities corresponding to schedule, cost, quality and no-dispute performance criteria, respectively. Results show that project coordination issues can be addressed by attending to essentially the four broad groups of coordination activities - resource handling, planning, team building and contract implementation. Findings presented in the paper could interest construction professionals and help them identify and concentrate on important coordination activities.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | coordination; project management; project performance; questionnaire |
| Index terms: | performance criteria, compliance, critical path, commitment, survey, construction project, questionnaire, team building, project success, dispute, owner, monitoring, construction professional, project performance, dimension, implementation, coordination, project management |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, control systems, dispute resolution, operations research, psychology, health monitoring assessment and metrics, contractual arrangements, management, performance measurement, professional development, project management theory and practice, production management, health safety and environment, sociology |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Information Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Procurement, Legal Issues, Quality Management, Site Management, Organizational Design, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here