Kelly, J (2007) Making client values explicit in value management workshops. Construction Management and Economics, 25(4), pp. 435-442. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
Value management is a project-focused process that makes explicit and appraises the functional benefits of a product, process or service consistent with a value system determined by the client. The value system of the client necessarily requires a method for value setting using harder performance variables than the commonly described facets of time, cost and quality. Current value theory is critically appraised in the context of current value management practice. The research proposition is that the constituent parts of time, cost and quality can be made overt enabling a client to express satisfaction in terms of a finite number of variables enabling the explicit statement of client value within a value management workshop. An action research study into the discovery of the component parts of the client's value system at the early stages of construction projects concludes that the variables are the nine non-correlated, high order, discretionary performance variables of capital expenditure, operational expenditure, time, esteem, environment, exchange, politics/community, flexibility and comfort.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | client; function analysis; quality; value; value management |
| Index terms: | value management, comfort, client value, satisfaction, workshop, function analysis, politics, capital expenditure, construction project, action research |
| Subjects: | production management, management, political science, occupational health and safety management, data collection methods, construction type, client relations, data science, project delivery, economic analysis |
| Topics: | Value Management, Governance, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Project Management, Health and Safety, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here