Learning approaches for housing, service and infrastructure project organizations

Knauseder, I; Josephson, P E and Styhre, A (2007) Learning approaches for housing, service and infrastructure project organizations. Construction Management and Economics, 25(8), pp. 857-867. ISSN 1466433X

Abstract

Capturing and sharing experiences that may be applicable in several projects is generally recognized as a way of enhancing the performance of construction projects. Several studies have reported difficulties in applying learning approaches that could be applicable for a wide range of projects. The learning behaviour in three types of construction project: housing, service and infrastructure, is examined by the means of a questionnaire study including 51 construction projects and more than 800 responses from clients, designers, contractors' managers, contractors' workers and subcontractors. The effects of leadership, openness and influence are considered. Based on a factor analysis, three approaches to learning were identified: organizing for learning, experimenting and networking. While housing project organizations do not demonstrate any specific preferences, service project organizations show a focus on networking and infrastructure project organizations show the highest interest in experimenting. On the basis of these results it can be concluded that learning approaches are dependent on the type of project. Thus adopting different learning approaches for different types of construction project seems to be a more relevant strategy than implementing a 'one size fits all' learning approach for all construction project organizations.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: leadership; organizational learning; questionnaire
Index terms: factor analysis, infrastructure project, service project, designer, questionnaire, construction project, subcontractor, housing, preference, organizational learning, manager, housing project, strategy, networking
Subjects: professional development, production management, decision-making and reasoning, management, statistical analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, housing and residential development, practitioner, data collection methods, profession, construction type, communication
Topics: Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here