Applying a random coefficients logistic model to contractors' decision to bid

Oo, B L; Drew, D S and Lo, H P (2007) Applying a random coefficients logistic model to contractors' decision to bid. Construction Management and Economics, 25(4), pp. 387-398. ISSN 1466433X

Abstract

Contractors' decision to bid is dependent on many individual characteristics, including some that are unobservable by their competitors. There is natural heterogeneity across contractors in terms of their (i) intrinsic bid/no-bid preferences; and (ii) responses to decision to bid factors. This heterogeneity can be accounted for by applying a random coefficients approach to multiple bid/no-bid responses through logistic modelling. The bid/no-bid data were collected from managers of large and medium-sized contractors in Hong Kong via a designed bidding experiment. Two random coefficients logistic models are developed. Model 1 considers only two groups of decision to bid factors, namely market environment factors (i.e. number of bidders, market conditions) and project-specific factors (i.e. type and size of project). Model 2 extends Model 1 by adding two subject factors (i.e. years of experience, firm size) to study the effect of these individual factors on decision to bid. The results show that there is significant unobserved heterogeneity across contractors and that ignoring its effect results in a downward bias in the parameter estimates of the decision to bid factors. In using this approach contractors can better account for unobserved characteristics of their competitors when formulating their competitive strategies in deciding to bid.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: bidding; decision making; logistic modelling
Index terms: decision to bid, decision-making, bias, bidding, bid/no-bid, competitive strategy, preference, manager, number of bidders, experiment, market condition, estimate, modelling, Hong Kong
Subjects: probability and distributions, Geography, decision-making and reasoning, decision analysis, practitioner, economic and policy analysis, data collection methods, financial and cost management, analytical methods, economic analysis, bidding
Topics: Procurement, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here