Qc, A N (2007) Expert evidence: Problems and safeguards. Construction Management and Economics, 25(7), pp. 785-790. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
This paper examines the role of expert evidence and expert witnesses in the resolution of construction disputes. The history of experts in court is traced through the cases, including guidelines as to the proper conduct of experts. The status and potential liability of an expert is then considered, particularly in the context of the recent Court of Appeal in Meadow v. General Medical Council [2007] 1 All ER 1. The role of an expert as advocate is considered and conclusions drawn as to the key problems which arise.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction dispute; expert evidence; negligence; witness |
| Index terms: | history, expert witness, resolution, safeguards, negligence, construction dispute, evidence, liability |
| Subjects: | architectural and construction history, occupational health and safety management, practitioner, liability law, evaluation and assessment methods, dispute resolution, conflict resolution |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here