Lou, E C W; Lee, A and Goulding, J (2020) E-readiness in construction (ERiC): Self-assessment framework for UK small and medium enterprise building services providers. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 16(1), pp. 3-22. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
The construction industry’s ability to innovate in order to improve its practices has been widely debated. As organisations in other sectors globally are addressing technology challenges, is the UK construction industry e-ready? Of particular concern is the plethora of small and medium enterprises (SME) that constitute over 80% of the UK construction industry. There are noticeable SME laggards in the uptake of new processes and technologies. This paper aims to assess the e-readiness levels of UK SME building services provider in order to leverage the advantages of technology opportunities in the future. The resultant self-assessment ERiC framework enables SMEs to quantify and measure e-readiness from an organisation, technical and process perspective.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building services providers; construction; e-readiness; small and medium enterprise |
| Index terms: | construction industry, building service |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, engineering systems |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 CT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here