Sang, K J C; Dainty, A R J and Ison, S G (2007) Gender: A risk factor for occupational stress in the architectural profession? Construction Management and Economics, 25(12), pp. 1305-1317. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
There is significant evidence that those working in construction are at risk of poor health and well-being due to long working hours, job insecurity, poor work-life balance, low professional worth and temporary teams. There is also a disparate body of evidence which highlights the discrimination experienced by women working in the construction industry. There is, however, a paucity of research exploring gender differences in occupational health and well-being within construction. The current research utilizes standardized measures of occupational health and well-being to identify any gender-determined differences among a sample of architects. A self-completion questionnaire was used to assess job satisfaction, physical health problems, work-life conflict and turnover intentions. Female respondents reported significantly lower overall job satisfaction and significantly higher levels of insomnia and constipation, work-life conflict and turnover intentions. Although further work is needed to understand the causal relationships between variables and the nature of the female architects' dissatisfactions and concerns, the suggestion that women working in the architectural profession are at risk of poorer occupational health and well-being than their male colleagues will be of concern to a profession seeking to embrace diversity.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | architects; gender differences; occupational health and well-being; women |
| Index terms: | discrimination, well-being, working hours, evidence, questionnaire, health and wellbeing, occupational stres, occupational health, turnover, construction industry, insomnia, work-life balance, profession, women, architect, risk factor, job satisfaction |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, professional ethics, environmental hazards, occupational health and safety management, sociology, health conditions and diseases, employment law, management, business management, institututions, profession, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, mental health and wellbeing |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Legal Issues, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here