Mellado, F; Wong, P F; Amano, K; Johnson, C and Lou, E C W (2020) Digitisation of existing buildings to support building assessment schemes: Viability of automated sustainability-led design scan-to-BIM process. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 16(2), pp. 84-99. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
Buildings' functional and physical characteristics can be digitally represented through Building Information Modelling (BIM) which creates a sharing platform for all stakeholders involved in the project lifecycle. The application of BIM has been studied throughout the years mainly in new buildings with less emphasis in refurbishing existing ones due to the limited availability of accurate data of the original project. However, maintaining and refurbishing existing buildings often contributes to higher risk and cost. In addition, more buildings are required to undertake building assessment schemes such as Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method (BREEAM), Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), Green Star, Green Mark, and Green Building Index (GBI)–most were not designed to assess existing buildings. In this sense, laser scanning can be used to collect existing parametric building data as point clouds, which can be developed and used for modelling of energy consumption, comfort and costing. This can be then translated back into assessment schemes. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate the process flow in the usage of laser scanning for existing buildings to support sustainability-led design by a new scan-to-BIM process.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | assessment schemes; BIM; laser scanning; refurbishment; scan-to-BIM; sustainability-led design |
| Index terms: | environmental assessment, project lifecycle, platform, green building, building assessment, laser scanning, modelling, point cloud, building research, BREEAM accreditation, environmental design, costing, energy consumption, physical characteristic, building information modelling, comfort |
| Subjects: | environmental impact, energy systems, information systems, research management, asset management, digital design, accounting and finance, analytical methods, environmental policy, design practice, material properties and characteristics, project completion, occupational health and safety management, sustainability and energy |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Project Management, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here