Coaching the site manager: Effects on learning and managerial practice

Styhre, A and Josephson, P E (2007) Coaching the site manager: Effects on learning and managerial practice. Construction Management and Economics, 25(12), pp. 1295-1304. ISSN 1466433X

Abstract

Coaching has emerged as a potentially powerful leadership development approach, capable of effectively blending theoretical knowledge and practical skills in onsite training. To date, little research on the use of coaching in the construction industry has been published and the coaching literature is primarily written by coaches with vested interests. In addition, there are a limited number of critical and empirical evaluations of the approach. A year-long action research coaching project in the Swedish construction industry shows that site managers participating in the coaching programme developed skills for reflecting on their work life situation, improved their communication, and became better equipped for seeing a broader range of perspectives in their work. In addition, the coaching programme opened up new discussions in the construction projects, which benefited further communication. The overall reception of the coaching programme was enthusiastic. While coaching does not come without costs and efforts, it may serve as a leadership development approach capable of helping site managers develop their leadership skills, cope with work-family conflicts, and improve their communication.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: coaching; leadership development; site managers
Index terms: onsite, site manager, leadership development, construction industry, action research, programme, construction project, work-family conflict
Subjects: production management, management, industry analysis, building construction, project controls, practitioner, data collection methods, training
Topics: Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Research Practice, Project Management, Time Control, Human Resources
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here