Integrating configuration-based seismic design principles into architectural education: Teaching strategies for lecture courses

Morales-Beltran, M and Yildiz, B (2020) Integrating configuration-based seismic design principles into architectural education: Teaching strategies for lecture courses. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 16(4), pp. 310-328. ISSN 1745-2007

Abstract

The importance of teaching seismic design in architecture schools is widely acknowledged and regarded as fundamental in earthquake-prone countries. Clear and consistent seismic design guidelines are available to sustain the introduction of seismic design-related subjects in architecture curricula. Although scholars seem to agree on the suitability of studio design projects as optimal vehicles for seismic design-architecture integration, research on teaching methods seems to lack specific strategies for architecture students to acquire seismic knowledge before designing. This paper introduces a set of seismic design principles based on generic earthquake-resistant configurations, used as qualitative and quantitative components in two different teaching strategies applied in a school of architecture lecture course. The basis of the approach lies in a distinction between introducing seismic design and introducing seismic design principles (SDP). We argue that seismic design, a primarily quantitative process, does not properly match architectural design, which is essentially qualitative. Hence, both quantitative and qualitative learning methods are needed to provide architecture students with knowledge on the physical phenomena behind successful earthquake-resistant configurations and the skills necessary to integrate them into their studio designs. The validity of the proposed strategies is discussed through a description of methods explored by the first author during a lecture course given between 2014 and 2017. The effectiveness of these SDP-based methods is further evaluated through surveys and interviews with former students. The final discussion addresses substantial considerations that need to be taken into account when teaching architecture students subjects that are traditionally associated with engineering teaching methods.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: architectural design; architectural education; configuration; design principles; seismic design; teaching/learning methods
Index terms: effectiveness, studio, configuration, integration, earthquake, teaching method, architectural design, suitability, seismic design, interview, survey, validity, design principle, strategy, architectural education
Subjects: construction type, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, design methods, curriculum design, performance management, structural engineering, management, design practice, teaching methods, organizational analysis, systems engineering, environmental hazards, design criteria
Topics: Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Design Practice, Quality Management, Organizational Design, Education
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here