Aibinu, A A and Pasco, T (2008) The accuracy of pre-tender building cost estimates in Australia. Construction Management and Economics, 26(12), pp. 1257-1269. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
A pre-tender building cost estimate is an important piece of information when making decisions at the project planning and design stage. The important project characteristics influencing the accuracy of pre-tender building cost estimates are examined and practical improvement for increasing the accuracy of estimates are considered. A quantitative approach is used to address the research problem. Analysis of data from 56 projects and from a postal questionnaire survey of 102 quantity surveying firms suggests that the accuracy of pre-tender building cost estimates varies according to project size and principal structural material. When eight identified project characteristics are controlled in a multiple regression analysis, the accuracy of estimates is influenced by project size. The estimates of smaller projects are more biased than the estimates of larger projects. It was discovered that pre-tender building costs are more often overestimated than are underestimated. Overestimated forecasts are incorrect by a larger amount than underestimated forecasts. Data analysis also revealed that the accuracy of pre-tender building cost estimates has not improved over time. The majority of the respondents are somewhat dissatisfied with the accuracy of estimates in the industry. Probability estimation and simulation of past estimates, reducing quantity surveying and cost engineering skill turnover, incorporating market sentiments into estimates, early involvement of the quantity surveyor at the brief stage, and proper documentation of experience gained in the estimation of projects should help firms increase the accuracy of estimates for new projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Australia; estimating accuracy; pre-tender estimates; quantity surveying; tendering |
| Index terms: | accuracy, survey, documentation, surveying, data analysis, quantity surveying firm, turnover, estimating, project planning, multiple regression analysis, questionnaire, design stage, Australia, estimation, pre-tender estimate, quantity surveying, cost engineering, cost estimate, estimate |
| Subjects: | Geography, professional development, tendering, statistical analysis, control systems, profession, data collection methods, data analysis and analytics, business management, professional practice, health monitoring assessment and metrics, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Procurement, Roles and Professions, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here