Volume building as competitive strategy

Chiang, Y H; Tang, B S and Wong, F (2008) Volume building as competitive strategy. Construction Management and Economics, 26(2), pp. 161-176. ISSN 1466433X

Abstract

The competitive strategy and advantage of building contractors is examined. In Hong Kong, just a few contractors have dominated the market of public housing construction, where prefabrication is mandatory. Does prefabrication technology lead to business success? Based on quantitative analysis of a questionnaire survey and its validation with interviews, we find that prefabrication by itself is not regarded as a sustainable source of competitive advantage. Instead, market share is the most statistically significant factor related to business growth. The experience curve theory suggests that, upon acquiring a critical volume of business, contractors have the opportunity to exploit economies of scale, bargaining power and learning to reduce costs to get more business. Through this iterative process, some contractors would manage to innovate their building process to make their supply chain management more efficient and effective than others', thus attaining competitive advantage in cost leadership and getting more business in return to sustain their volume building strategy. The findings suggest that, to succeed in a mature industry such as building construction, it takes clever harnessing of the construction process rather than simply the mastery of prefabrication technology itself.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: competitive advantage; Hong Kong; prefabrication; strategy
Index terms: prefabrication, public housing, bargaining, building contractor, business growth, Hong Kong, market share, competitive advantage, competitive strategy, quantitative analysis, building process, questionnaire, validation, construction process, survey, building construction, strategy, interview
Subjects: practitioner, strategic management, construction type, data collection methods, data analysis and analytics, economic analysis, Geography, professional development, management, economics, market analysis, building construction
Topics: Site Management, Supply Chain Management, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Information Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here