Variance models for project financial risk analysis with applications to greenfield BOT highway projects

Chiara, N and Garvin, M (2008) Variance models for project financial risk analysis with applications to greenfield BOT highway projects. Construction Management and Economics, 26(9), pp. 925-939. ISSN 1466433X

Abstract

Assessment of BOT project financial risk is generally performed by combining Monte Carlo simulation with discounted cash flow analysis. The outcomes of this risk assessment depend, to a significant extent, upon the total project uncertainty, which aggregates aleatory and epistemic uncertainties of key risk variables. Unlike aleatory uncertainty, modelling epistemic uncertainty is a rather difficult endeavour. In fact, BOT epistemic uncertainty may vary according to the significant information disclosed during the concession period. Two properties generally characterize the stochastic behaviour of the uncertainty of BOT epistemic variables: (1) the learning property and (2) the increasing uncertainty property. A new family of Markovian processes, the Martingale variance model and the general variance model, are proposed as an alternative modelling tool for BOT risk variables. Unlike current stochastic models, the proposed models can be adapted to incorporate a risk analyst's view of properties (1) and (2). A case study, a hypothetical BOT transportation project, illustrates that failing to properly model a project's epistemic uncertainty may lead to a biased estimate of the project's financial risk. The variance models may support, guide and extend the thinking process of risk analysts who face the challenging task of representing subjective assessments of key risk factors.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: build-operate-transfer; Monte Carlo simulation; risk analysis; stochastic models
Index terms: aggregate, discounted cash flow, risk analysis, transportation project, Monte Carlo simulation, modelling, case study, variance, risk assessment, face, estimate, highway construction, build-operate-transfer, project uncertainty, concession period, risk factor
Subjects: environmental hazards, contractual arrangements, civil engineering, financial risk, contract structure, modelling and simulation, analytical methods, financial and cost management, project management theory and practice, materials science, psychology, infrastructure and transport systems, measurement and scaling, data collection methods, financial analysis
Topics: Research Practice, Organizational Design, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Cost Management, Procurement
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here