Practical approaches for engaging stakeholders: Findings from the UK

Chinyio, E A and Akintoye, A (2008) Practical approaches for engaging stakeholders: Findings from the UK. Construction Management and Economics, 26(6), pp. 591-599. ISSN 1466433X

Abstract

Principles for managing stakeholders are discussed in the context of UK construction practice. The number of stakeholders in a modern construction project can be large, presenting numerous interfaces that have to be managed. Meanwhile, each organization has its own characteristic disposition. Therefore, the interactions between diverse organizations in a project pose a high potential for conflicting stakes. Against this background, stakeholder management assumes high priority. Qualitative research was used to investigate the practice of stakeholder management with 12 UK companies in the construction sector. Interviews were held with these companies and content analysis was used to identify themes that demonstrate effective stakeholder management practice. Construct validity and a workshop underpinned the verification of underlying and frontline approaches for managing stakeholders. The underlying approaches include maintaining existing relationships, providing top-level support and being proactive while the frontline approaches include the use of negotiations, trade-offs, incentives and concessions.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: communication; conflict; corporate governance; negotiation; relationship
Index terms: negotiation, interaction, validity, workshop, stakeholder management practice, corporate governance, stakeholder management, construction sector, qualitative research, construction project, content analysis, interview
Subjects: evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, construction type, business, research design and methodology, participation process, data analysis and analytics, production management, industry analysis, behavioral psychology, conflict resolution
Topics: Research Practice, Project Management, Stakeholder Management, Governance, Construction Technology
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here