Huang, Y L (2008) The pricing of conditional performance guarantees with risky collateral. Construction Management and Economics, 26(9), pp. 967-978. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
Conditional performance guarantees with risky collaterals are specific bonding instruments that are not credit extensions or require only a service fee. Instead, they resemble a credit default swap (CDS) that is essentially an insurance contract and can thus be priced accordingly. A CDS-based model is proposed here for pricing these instruments. The model incorporates both contractor default probability and the recovery risk of collateral. It also allows for explicit specification of bonding parameters such as the promised amount of payment in the event of default. For model implementation, a quasi-KMV-Merton approach is proposed for the estimation of contractor default probability. The historical market prices and basic accounting data of publicly traded construction firms in the Taiwan Economic Journal Database (TEJD) are used to test the model. The model demonstrates effective statistical power to distinguish categorized samples of the firms. It shows that the current industrial practice of asking a standard service rate of 1% tends to charge too little for financially distressed firms and too much for normal ones.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | collateral; contractor default probability; credit default swap; guarantees; models; pricing |
| Index terms: | implementation, insurance, estimation, database, recovery, pricing, accounting, journal, construction firm, Taiwan, guarantee, specification, default |
| Subjects: | data management, contract structure, Geography, contractual condition, operations management, contractual arrangements, economic analysis, financial and cost management, research dissemination and communication, organization, dispute resolution |
| Topics: | Contract Administration, Digital Applications, Legal Issues, Procurement, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here