Rasmussen, F N; Birkved, M and Birgisdóttir, H (2020) Low- carbon design strategies for new residential buildings: lessons from architectural practice. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 16(5), pp. 374-390. ISSN 1745-2007
Abstract
This study presents the environmental life cycle assessment of four low carbon design strategies applied in Danish, architectural practice. The subject of analysis is a set of five buildings erected within the same constrictions in terms of floor area, energy performance and construction costs. The tested design strategies were: use of recycled materials, design for extended durability of components, adaptable design, and design for reduction of operational energy demand. The results of the five buildings are compared with a reference building (i.e. a typical, Danish single-family dwelling). Results show that the recycling/upcycling strategy is the most effective in reducing the embodied carbon. The use of structural wood in the same design furthermore points to the use of wood as a viable low-carbon strategy. In combination, these two strategies result in an approximate 40% saving of life cycle embodied carbon compared to the reference. Using durable materials yields up to 30% lower embodied carbon compared to the reference, whereas a design for adaptability results in 17% lower embodied carbon. However, these results are sensitive to the scenarios made for the service lives of materials and the implemented disassembly solutions. In a life cycle carbon perspective, the emissions from energy use prove to be of importance, although depending on the modelling approaches of the energy mix. With the shrinking, global carbon budgets in mind, there is justified reason to holistically optimize the design of new buildings by integrating various design aspects addressing the whole life cycle of the building.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building design; carbon budgets; embodied carbon; life cycle assessment; mitigation strategies |
| Index terms: | disassembly, energy performance, construction cost, durability, wood, recycling, energy demand, low carbon, residential building, recycled materials, life cycle assessment, strategy, design strategy, building design, embodied carbon, modelling, life cycle, architectural practice, mitigation, design for adaptability, whole life cycle, energy mix, energy use |
| Subjects: | design process, value management, business, design methods, construction type, sustainability assessment, architectural design, traditional and composite building materials, waste management, financial risk, health safety and environment, management, analytical methods, material degradation and durability, environmental impact, operations management, financial and cost management, energy systems |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Construction Technology, Project Management, Cost Management, Site Management, Business Strategy, Construction Materials, Design Practice, Sustainability, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here