Lin, Y H; Lee, P C and Chang, T P (2008) Integrating grey number and minkowski distance function into grey relational analysis technique to improve the decision quality under uncertain information. Construction Management and Economics, 26(2), pp. 115-123. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
Giving precise evaluation numbers becomes much more problematic in decision-making problems owing to the growing uncertainty inherently embedded in the increasing complexity of engineering systems. To alleviate this problem, both grey number and Minkowski distance function are integrated into the grey relational analysis technique to establish an effective multi-attribute decision-making model. In the proposed model, the uncertain information is transformed through the operations of grey numbers and then evaluated by the approachability of the ideal preference alternative, from which the suitability of each alternative is measured by the grey number Minkowski distance function to decide the appropriate selection. Two illustrative examples, the selection of construction alternatives and the evaluation of subcontractors, are adopted to demonstrate the feasibility and practicability of the proposed model. Results are confirmed by the experts afterwards and show that the proposed model is efficient, robust and well appropriate for real-world applications.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | grey number; grey relational analysis technique; multi-attribute decision making; uncertain information |
| Index terms: | decision-making, preference, suitability, complexity, subcontractor |
| Subjects: | decision-making and reasoning, design criteria, systems engineering, decision analysis, practitioner |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here