Behaviour of quantity surveyors as organizational citizens

Liu, A M M and Fellows, R (2008) Behaviour of quantity surveyors as organizational citizens. Construction Management and Economics, 26(12), pp. 1271-1282. ISSN 1466433X

Abstract

Understanding the individual's collectivistic orientations toward group goals and task activities is critical for developing cooperative and productive teams. The complex environment of modern construction, where the emphasis shifts from individually oriented to team-based work, has led to many challenges. There are important issues of cooperative behaviours in a world of cultural pluralism in which interpersonal cooperation is juxtaposed with organizational citizenship behaviour. Behaviours of construction project participants are important manifestations of culture that are dependent upon norms, values and beliefs. Certain organizational cultures support individualistic behaviours while others emphasize the benefits to the collective whole. Collectivistic orientation is examined as the cultural dimension of individualism-collectivism (IC) and found to be related to organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB) where the correlations of IC and most OCB variables are significant for quantity surveyors in Hong Kong. Generally, the (more) individualistic persons are less likely to exhibit organizational citizenship behaviours.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: culture; individualism-collectivism; organizational citizenship behaviour
Index terms: cooperation, norms, organizational culture, construction project, cooperative behaviour, dimension, Hong Kong, quantity surveying
Subjects: health monitoring assessment and metrics, psychology, profession, sociology, Geography, production management
Topics: Health and Safety, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Roles and Professions, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here