Performance measurement of construction firms in developing countries

Luu, T V; Kim, S Y; Cao, H L and Park, Y M (2008) Performance measurement of construction firms in developing countries. Construction Management and Economics, 26(4), pp. 373-386. ISSN 1466433X

Abstract

Many large contractors in Vietnam are lacking an effective method to measure their performance and identify weaknesses and threats. The integration of the balanced scorecard (BSC) and strengths-weaknesses-opportunities-threats (SWOT) matrix is described to evaluate the strategic performance of large contractors in Vietnam. The AnGiang Construction Company (ACC) was used as an example to validate the approach. The BSC-oriented SWOT matrix is developed to formulate the short- and long-term strategies of ACC. The benchmarking approach was adapted to evaluate the ACC's performance and expose its competitors' best practices for improvement. The results indicated that only the financial perspective is at a poor level on the performance scale whereas the customer, learning and growth, and internal process perspectives are at a moderate level on the performance scale. The effective evaluation matrix uncovered 11 effective solutions that could be grouped under four categories: (1) innovating organizational structure; (2) effectively managing processes at construction sites; (3) stepping up cost control; and (4) improving equipment management. The findings may benefit not only Vietnamese construction firms but also firms in other developing countries to identify their strategies, quantify the strategic performance, and improve their competitive advantages.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: balanced scorecard; construction companies; performance measurement; SWOT analysis; Vietnam
Index terms: balanced scorecard, competitive advantage, performance measurement, best practice, equipment management, strategy, construction site, construction firm, strengths-weaknesses-opportunities-threats, construction company, Vietnam, developing country, organizational structure, benchmarking, integration, cost control
Subjects: work location, operational management, financial and cost management, organization, business, risk assessment, sociology, market analysis, organizational analysis, performance measurement, management, development economics, Geography
Topics: Quality Management, International Construction, Organizational Design, Site Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Plant and Equipment, Risk Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here