Menches, C L; Hanna, A S; Nordheim, E V and Russell, J S (2008) Impact of pre-construction planning and project characteristics on performance in the US electrical construction industry. Construction Management and Economics, 26(8), pp. 855-869. ISSN 01446193
Abstract
The mild recession experienced in the early part of this decade forced many US electrical contractors to reduce their profit margins as a way to win jobs and survive economically. However, to make up for lower profit margins, contractors turned to 'better planning' as a method for improving their efficiency and increasing their profitability. In general, contractors believe that better planning contributes to better project performance, but the evidence has been mostly anecdotal. A study was conducted recently that transformed anecdotal evidence about the impact of pre-construction planning on performance into quantitative evidence. The research resulted in the development of a model pre-construction planning process that was based on outstanding projects that were well planned and performed well. The study quantified the relationship between pre-construction planning activities, project characteristics and performance, and a separate validation study found that those projects that performed a comprehensive planning process similar to the model planning process were more likely to achieve their estimated work hours, profit, budget and completion goals.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | assessments; construction planning; efficiency; electrical measurement; performance measurement |
| Index terms: | profit, validation, evidence, efficiency, recession, performance measurement, planning process, pre-construction, profitability, comprehensive planning, project performance, construction industry, construction planning |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, project controls, project management theory and practice, professional development, performance management, performance measurement, construction planning, economic analysis, project delivery, urban planning, evaluation and assessment methods |
| Topics: | Governance, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Business Strategy, Site Management, Time Control, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here