Minchin, R E; Hammons, M I and Ahn, J (2008) A construction quality index for highway construction. Construction Management and Economics, 26(12), pp. 1313-1324. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
Changes in policy regarding the use of contractor-conducted testing in quality assurance decisions have hit state highway agencies (SHAs) during a time of continuing reduction in agency personnel. These changes have increased the need for quality-driven contractors. This, coupled with more agencies adopting specifications tied to performance, places more requirements on contractors to emphasize quality management in their operations. There is a need for rational, comprehensive methods to evaluate a contractor's end product from a quality perspective; thus, there is a need for new techniques and approaches for examining and rating the quality of performance. Researchers and practitioners alike should benefit from this description of the construction quality index (CQI) developed through a grant from the Florida Department of Transportation. The CQI is a rating of the quality of materials and workmanship on highway projects that, unlike current quality rating models used by SHAs, is completely objective. Under limited validation testing, the model proved able to assign quality index values consistent with the owner's level of satisfaction with the overall project.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | analytical hierarchy process; highways; pavement; quality |
| Index terms: | owner, satisfaction, analytical hierarchy process, testing, quality management, highway construction, quality assurance, specification, personnel, workmanship, construction quality, agency, validation, practitioner |
| Subjects: | practitioner, professional practice, project delivery, management, civil engineering, contractual condition, professional development, sociology, decision-making and optimization, quality assurance |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Quality Management, Contract Administration, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here