Public private partnership projects in Greece: Risk ranking and preferred risk allocation

Roumboutsos, A and Anagnostopoulos, K P (2008) Public private partnership projects in Greece: Risk ranking and preferred risk allocation. Construction Management and Economics, 26(7), pp. 751-763. ISSN 1466433X

Abstract

Project participants, through experience, have an initial perception and predisposition towards risk and the types of risks they are willing and able to undertake. This is equally true for parties interested in public-private partnership (PPP) projects. These initial positions have been registered for the major Greek PPP market stakeholders potentially involved in a PPP arrangement through a survey covering all candidate construction companies, interested financing institutes and a number of public sector entities to be involved in PPPs. Findings revealed that stakeholders were, for the majority of risks identified, in agreement as to preferred risk allocation. Risk allocation preferences for construction companies were compared with similar findings for the UK, a mature PPP market, indicating a possible learning/maturing process based on the particular country background. Conclusions add to other surveys carried out on the subject and should enable public sector clients to establish a more efficient framework for risk allocation, thus reducing negotiations prior to contract award and minimizing the risk of poor risk distribution.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: public-private partnerships; risk allocation; stakeholders
Index terms: public sector, partnership, negotiation, public private partnership, risk allocation, construction company, survey, Greece, public-sector client, financing, preference
Subjects: Geography, financial risk, decision-making and reasoning, administrative law, conflict resolution, partnership management, sociology, data collection methods, organization, contractual arrangements, economic analysis
Topics: Legal Issues, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Procurement
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here