Stakeholder management through empowerment: Modelling project success

Rowlinson, S and Cheung, Y K F (2008) Stakeholder management through empowerment: Modelling project success. Construction Management and Economics, 26(6), pp. 611-623. ISSN 1466433X

Abstract

Stakeholder management is part of the project management process and this ongoing research builds on previous studies in the field of relationship management in Hong Kong and Australia and presents a testable stakeholder management process model in which the concepts of empowerment, organizational culture, trust and commitment are used as a basis for exploring the process. This may appear somewhat paradoxical to the reader as project managers, traditionally, have been seen to attempt to mollify stakeholders while focusing their attention on the details of project management rather than to empower stakeholders to have a significant input to the project-empowerment being seen to encourage 'interference' from non-specialists into the managers' domain. This change in attitude to stakeholders marks a culture change in the real estate and construction industry, brought about by an increased emphasis on relationship management. The research reported in this paper looks at the issues of stakeholder management via a research model that has identified project contextual factors which, through perceptual processes, influence empowerment and so the outcomes of the project. Hence, the problem addressed is how and why relationship management and stakeholder management are different in two unique cultures and what elements can be considered common and what elements are different.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Australia; empowerment; Hong Kong; relationship management; stakeholder management model
Index terms: project management process, relationship management, real estate, project management, modelling, construction industry, project success, project manager, Hong Kong, Australia, organizational culture, stakeholder management, manager, empowerment, commitment
Subjects: industry analysis, sociology, project management theory and practice, Geography, management, analytical methods, participation process, real estate economics, psychology, practitioner, profession
Topics: Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Organizational Design, Urban Studies, Human Resources
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here