The role of social capital in knowledge sharing: The case of a specialist rock construction company

Styhre, A (2008) The role of social capital in knowledge sharing: The case of a specialist rock construction company. Construction Management and Economics, 26(9), pp. 941-951. ISSN 1466433X

Abstract

In the discourse on knowledge management, the concept of social capital plays a key role as the mediator of individual know-how or 'human capital' (i.e. individual cognitive or embodied skills and know-how) and structural 'organizational capital', i.e. knowledge embedded in the routines and standard operating procedures of an organization. A study of a Swedish specialist rock construction company, ConCo, demonstrates how the social network acquired by individual site managers is mobilized when unanticipated events occur in day-to-day working life. Rather than using a written or mediated system of knowledge sharing (i.e. Intranets or databases), the site managers relied primarily on verbal communication with their peers. Whenever they encounter a problem, site managers talk to their colleagues or call experts outside the firm in order to get credible and useful advice on how to handle precarious situations. One of the implications of the study is that conceiving of knowledge not as an individual property but as a social accomplishment may enable more detailed understanding of how intellectual resources are used in the construction industry.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: knowledge management; learning-by-doing; social capital
Index terms: site manager, construction industry, mediator, human capital, database, knowledge management, routine, standard operating procedure, social network, construction company, social capital, knowledge sharing
Subjects: professional development, economics, industry analysis, sociology, data management, process management, dispute resolution, practitioner, organization, knowledge management
Topics: Digital Applications, Legal Issues, Quality Management, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here