Bygballe, L E and Jahre, M (2009) Balancing value creating logics in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 27(7), pp. 695-704. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
Construction companies apply different logics to create value. Some companies are organized according to one primary logic, while others are based on multiple logics. Different value creating logics have different cost and value drivers according to the type of activities involved and the interdependencies between them. Where multiple logics coexist, the different cost and value drivers may generate tensions. The purpose of the paper is to study how construction companies maintain a balance between multiple logics and how they handle tensions between them through a case study from the Norwegian construction industry. Both project management and supply chain management perspectives have been used to explain construction practice. By applying a 'value configuration analysis', it is clear how value creation is achieved in construction practice by balancing the needs of both the project and the supply chain. Both intra- and inter-organizational interactions are vital in creating value across different logics. The contribution of the study lies in applying this framework to the construction area by adding knowledge about the underlying principles of different logics, including the tensions between them. Furthermore, the case study illustrates how these may be handled in order to create value in construction.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | case study; interaction; interdependence; Norway; value creating logics |
| Index terms: | value creation, configuration, construction company, Norway, project management, interdependence, interaction, construction industry, case study |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, organization, organizational analysis, industry analysis, systems engineering, behavioral psychology, economic development, Geography, project management theory and practice |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here