Choi, K; Lee, E B; Ibbs, C W and Kim, Y W (2009) Multifaceted public outreach and cost-benefit analysis for its effectiveness validation. Construction Management and Economics, 27(8), pp. 771-782. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
A heavily trafficked 4.5km highway stretch on Interstate 15 east of Los Angeles was rebuilt using two extended closures, each spanning nine days with 24/7 operations. Before and during the closures, a multifaceted, extensive, dynamic public outreach programme was implemented to gain public support for the project and to minimize inconvenience to the public. That outreach programme is described, its overall effectiveness in terms of total net benefit and traffic inconvenience during lane closures is assessed, and changes in public perception of the accelerated construction strategy resulting from the outreach programme is examined. Pre- and post-construction surveys performed using the project website mirrored the findings of the traffic measurement study, indicating that the outreach programme effectively reduced traffic demand. The results of two web-based surveys with a combined total of approximately 400 respondents indicated a dramatic change in public perception of the accelerated construction strategy. The survey results showed that strong initial objection to the accelerated project eventually became supportive of future, accelerated projects. The cost-benefit analysis showed that the additional cost of the outreach programme was outweighed by the savings achieved from reduced road user delay costs.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cost-benefit analysis; infrastructure management; project strategies; public outreach; web-based system |
| Index terms: | validation, Los Angeles, web-based system, strategy, survey, programme, project strategy, effectiveness, infrastructure management, savings |
| Subjects: | project controls, management, performance management, Geography, infrastructure engineering, professional development, digital technology, economic analysis, strategic project management, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Quality Management, Time Control, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here