Elazouni, A (2009) Heuristic method for multi-project finance-based scheduling. Construction Management and Economics, 27(2), pp. 199-211. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
A heuristic method is proposed for scheduling multiple projects subject to cash constraints. The heuristic determines cash availability during a given period, identifies all possible activities' schedules, determines the cash requirements for each schedule, ranks schedules based on the contribution to minimizing the increase in the project duration, schedules all activities of the selected schedule and determines the impact of the scheduled activities on the project cash flow. The effectiveness of the heuristic method was validated by comparing the results with the optimum results obtained by using the integer programming (IP) technique for 15 networks comprising up to 60 activities. The comparison indicated that the solutions obtained using the proposed heuristic are very comparable to the optimum solutions. An example of two concurrent projects was presented to demonstrate the proposed heuristic method. The proposed heuristic offers the ultimate flexibility to enter cash outflows and inflows at the actual occurrence time, the ability to rationalize the scheduling process, the flexibility to either devise or update schedules, and the ability to schedule practical-size multiple projects. Finally, this heuristic can be easily coded in software to help managers schedule projects under finance-constrained conditions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cash flow management; construction finance; financial management; heuristic; scheduling |
| Index terms: | project finance, manager, cash flow, scheduling, duration, integer programming, construction finance, effectiveness, financial management, heuristic, cash flow management |
| Subjects: | practitioner, risk assessment, economic analysis, operations research, financial management, performance management, algorithms, project controls |
| Topics: | Time Control, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Cost Management, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here