Unfolding roles and identities of professionals in construction projects: Exploring the informality of practices

Gluch, P (2009) Unfolding roles and identities of professionals in construction projects: Exploring the informality of practices. Construction Management and Economics, 27(10), pp. 959-968. ISSN 1466433X

Abstract

Using a practice lens perspective, the environmental professional's role is examined in relation to social practices in construction projects. Drawing on several case studies of environmental management, the findings show that contradictory practices prevent environmental professionals from fulfilling their expected role and function. Different world-views and communication cultures as well as a perception of environmental management as bureaucratic nit-picking, create tensions between environmental work and project practice. Dealing with these tensions, environmental professionals develop alternative identities to adapt to the different situations that they find themselves in, i.e. formal roles in accordance with their job description and informal roles to suit different project practices. However, this strategy seems to result in further fragmentation between existing practices, creating barriers between professions. The study reveals four aspects that affect the professional's role: relational and positional power, professional identity, visibility, and the facilitation of meaning-making processes in the project context. The research approach taken has created an opportunity to closely follow the development of an emerging profession in construction, opening a window that allows connecting a local and situational context to a wider societal discourse of environmentalism.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: environmental management; practice-based research; professionals; roles; social practice
Index terms: strategy, meaning, drawing, fragmentation, practice lens, window, construction project, social practice, case study, environmental management, profession, identity
Subjects: institututions, business, research design and methodology, data collection methods, technical documentation, production management, social theory, management, sustainability assessment, architectural elements, sociology
Topics: Organizational Design, Design Practice, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here