Johnsson, H and Meiling, J H (2009) Defects in offsite construction: Timber module prefabrication. Construction Management and Economics, 27(7), pp. 667-681. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
The construction industry is based on craftsmanship. Quality control and assurance procedures applied in manufacturing cannot usually be readily applied in construction, where there are higher degrees of uniqueness in each project. One category of companies, industrialized housebuilders, is attempting to bridge some of the gaps between construction and manufacturing. These companies prefabricate building modules for later assembly at the building site. Since they are wholly responsible for large parts of the building process, these companies have greater opportunities to control and improve quality in a more consistent way than ordinary construction companies. Thus, it could be hypothesized that the frequency and severity of defects should be lower in industrialized housing than in ordinary construction. The aim of the study presented here is to examine this hypothesis by measuring and characterizing defects in industrialized housing. The design and manufacturing processes at two Swedish timber module prefabrication firms has been analysed through interviews, site visits and document reviews. Quality audits from three phases of the building process were compiled, analysed and categorized to provide statistical measures of defects in industrialized housing. The results show that the case study companies are better in terms of product quality than conventional housing.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building defects; industrialized housing; modular construction; offsite production; quality management |
| Index terms: | construction industry, quality management, prefabrication, quality control, module, quality audit, housebuilder, product quality, manufacturing process, case study, housing, building process, modular construction, construction company, building site, interview, building defect |
| Subjects: | architectural elements, manufacturing engineering, site and location studies, building construction, quality assurance, industry analysis, organization, data collection methods, construction type, practitioner, project delivery, professional practice |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Design Practice, Site Management, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here