Critical success factors of construction research and development

Kulatunga, U; Amaratunga, D and Haigh, R (2009) Critical success factors of construction research and development. Construction Management and Economics, 27(9), pp. 891-900. ISSN 1466433X

Abstract

Research and development (R&D) activities are important to the construction industry to successfully address the challenges placed upon it and to be competitive. Identifying the factors that influence the success of construction R&D activities is important as such identification would help the research team to concentrate on the most significant and influential factors and the proper management of them to enhance the performance of construction R&D activities. The critical success factors (CSFs) of construction research and development during its different phases namely initiation, conceptualization, development and launch and at the project management stage were evaluated. A questionnaire survey and a series of semi-structured interviews were used to collect the data from academic members and industrial partners who have been involved in construction R&D activities. It revealed that from the initiation to the launch of the R&D project, emphasis was placed on the stakeholders' satisfaction. In contrast, less attention was given to satisfying the researchers' requirements during the R&D project. The principal investigator's role in leading the project and providing sufficient commitment; effective monitoring and controlling of activities, having a proper dissemination plan and effective dissemination of work were also elaborated.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: critical success factors; research and development; stakeholder satisfaction
Index terms: interview, commitment, survey, research and development, dissemination, influential factor, questionnaire, critical success factor, satisfaction, monitoring, stakeholder satisfaction, construction industry, project management
Subjects: research management, industry analysis, knowledge translation, project management theory and practice, psychology, participation process, project delivery, data collection methods, risk assessment, control systems
Topics: Organizational Design, Site Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here