Leiringer, R; Green, S D and Raja, J Z (2009) Living up to the value agenda: The empirical realities of through-life value creation in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 27(3), pp. 271-285. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
Current research agendas are increasingly encouraging the construction industry to operate on the basis of 'added value'. Such debates echo the established concept of 'high value manufacturing' and associated trends towards servitization. Within construction, the so-called 'value agenda' draws heavily from the notion of integrated solutions. This is held to be especially appropriate in the context of PFI projects. Also relevant is the concept of service-led projects whereby the project rationale is driven by the client's objectives for delivering an enhanced service to its own customers. Such ideas are contextualized by a consideration of broader trends of privatization and outsourcing within and across the construction industry's client base. The current emphasis on integrated solutions reflects long-term trends within privatized client organizations towards the outsourcing of asset management capabilities. However, such trends are by no means uniform or consistent. An in-depth case study of three operating divisions within a major construction company illustrates that firms are unlikely to reorientate their business in response to the 'value agenda'. In the case of PFI, the tendency has been to establish specialist units for the purposes of winning work. Meanwhile, institutionally embedded operating routines within the rest of the business remain broadly unaffected.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | integrated solutions; outsourcing; PFI; servitization; value |
| Index terms: | case study, outsourcing, added value, integrated solution, construction industry, privatization, high-value, routine, research agenda, construction company, client organization, asset management, value creation, servitization |
| Subjects: | economic development, industry analysis, asset management, research management, sociology, market strategies, innovation studies, business, client relations, organization, data collection methods, economic analysis |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here