Liu, J and Cheah, C Y J (2009) Real option application in PPP/PFI project negotiation. Construction Management and Economics, 27(4), pp. 331-342. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
Over the past two decades, many developing countries have grown to become more familiar with the notions and the use of public-private partnership/private financing initiative (PPP/PFI) schemes in building large-scale infrastructure assets. However, owing to higher levels of complexity and longer contractual durations, PPP/PFI projects are often embedded with higher risks. On the one hand, any private sector concessionaire would strive to secure some forms of subsidies or guarantees from the host government to alleviate its risk concerns. On the other hand, the host government would also attempt to counterbalance the grant of these incentives by introducing additional 'repayment' obligations, such as placement of a cap on the tariff or toll rates. Modelled as real options, support and repayment features found in the case of a wastewater treatment plant in Southern China are evaluated using a combination of Monte Carlo simulation and spreadsheet-based cash flow models. The objective is to illustrate how a negotiation band incorporating these option values can be constructed, which would enlarge the feasible bargaining range for both parties. The risk implications of two disparate bidding scenarios found in the case will also be discussed.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | concession; negotiation; private finance initiative; public-private partnerships; real option |
| Index terms: | China, complexity, financing, bidding, private finance initiative, toll, placement, developing country, cash flow, guarantee, concessionaire, duration, real option, negotiation, option, bargaining, private sector, partnership, Monte Carlo simulation, spreadsheet, subsidy |
| Subjects: | contract type, modelling and simulation, bidding, data science, contractual arrangements, economic analysis, financial management, management, contract structure, economics, Geography, development economics, partnership management, project controls, conflict resolution, decision analysis, industry analysis, transportation engineering, systems engineering |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Supply Chain Management, International Construction, Human Resources, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here