McGrath-Champ, S and Rosewarne, S (2009) Organizational change in Australian building and construction: Rethinking a unilinear 'leaning' discourse. Construction Management and Economics, 27(11), pp. 1111-1128. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
Over the past few decades there has been extensive reorganization of the construction industry in many developed countries including removal of head contractor companies from direct operational construction, elongation of the subcontracting chain, rising self-employment, casualization of work and reduced investment in training. These trends are the subject of a prescriptive, industry literature directed at industry 'improvement' and an important British-based critique of the underlying drivers of 'leanness' and organizational 're-engineering'. Drawing primarily upon interviews with organizations across the breadth of the industry, this paper provides evidence concerning such key changes in the Australian context, revealing both 'leaning'/'re-engineering' tendencies but also counter-tendencies necessitated by the goal of sustaining enduring enterprise and a viable labour force. A more reflexive approach by major companies to competitive pressures and risk shifting is revealed. Further, this evidence provides grounds for challenging the re-engineering/lean construction critique which is discerned as succumbing to the unitarist and unilinear discourse which it seeks to challenge.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Australia; business process re-engineering; lean production |
| Index terms: | evidence, self-employment, developed country, interview, organizational change, business process re-engineering, lean construction, labour force, drawing, lean production, construction industry, subcontracting, leanness, Australia, critique |
| Subjects: | evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, organization, business, technical documentation, management, manufacturing engineering, economics, Geography, development economics, business economics, building construction, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Design Practice, International Construction, Supply Chain Management, Site Management, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here