Ng, S T; Fan, R Y C; Wong, J M W; Chan, A P C; Chiang, Y H; Lam, P T I and Kumaraswamy, M (2009) Coping with structural change in construction: Experiences gained from advanced economies. Construction Management and Economics, 27(2), pp. 165-180. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
As an economy approaches maturity, the relative importance of the construction sector would gradually decline. Without effective policies and strategies, the construction industry will suffer irreversably and this may trigger a knock-on effect to the overall economy. The experiences of selected advanced economies are examined, including Australia, Japan, Singapore, South Korea and the UK in coping with structural changes in construction. Strategies employed by the government and the construction industry of these advanced economies to reinvent the construction industry were captured through an extensive literature review and a series of interviews with indigenous industry practitioners. In order to revitalize the construction industry, governments would accelerate publicly funded projects; provide financial support to ease the burden of industry stakeholders; and stimulate the market demand. In contrast, the industry would explore various market alternatives while companies would sharpen their competitive advantage locally and internationally through merger and acquisition. The identified strategies are corresponded to a construction industry development framework, which could therefore serve as a valuable reference for policy makers and practitioners to rejuvenate construction demand when a country approaches an urban service economy.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | advanced economies; construction industry; recession; recovery; strategy |
| Index terms: | acquisition, merger, Australia, construction industry development, South Korea, recovery, recession, Singapore, competitive advantage, construction industry, coping, construction demand, Japan, strategy, literature review, relative importance, interview, construction sector, practitioner |
| Subjects: | Geography, development economics, management, industry analysis, behavioral psychology, market analysis, practitioner, data collection methods, risk assessment, business, data analysis and analytics, economic analysis, operations management |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Business Strategy, International Construction |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here