Exploring gender differences in construction research: A European perspective

Powell, A; Hassan, T M; Dainty, A R J and Carter, C (2009) Exploring gender differences in construction research: A European perspective. Construction Management and Economics, 27(9), pp. 803-807. ISSN 1466433X

Abstract

Research suggests that women in academia face problematic career paths as a result of masculine cultures and horizontal segregation. At the same time, research in the construction sector has documented the barriers women face in entering and remaining in construction careers. Construction academia is investigating in this exploratory study to determine whether gender disparities found in academic research generally are valid in this field. As there is a lack of data on women in academia, particularly by sub-disciplines, scientific publication is used to explore gender differences and similarities. Publication is a significant area where gender disparities have been found in other fields and an area that can have substantial consequences for career progression in academia. The data are from a wider European study exploring women's participation in construction research and are based on secondary analysis of statistics from the ISI Web of Knowledge. Gender differences in publication are found to exist, suggesting that women are under-represented in construction research at a similar rate to women in engineering and technology academia. However, there are important differences between the different areas of construction research, which indicate that women may not face the same barriers and difficulties in all areas of construction academia. It also highlights the need for further research to investigate horizontal segregation and the gendered nature of publication, citation and collaboration in construction research.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Europe; gender; publication; research; women
Index terms: publication, career, academia, exploratory study, face, disparity, construction sector, secondary analysis, statistics, collaboration, women, Europe
Subjects: management, social justice, educational institutions, professional development, research methods, sociology, physical geography and landforms, research dissemination and communication, mathematical modelling, psychology, data science, industry analysis
Topics: Organizational Design, Education, Ethics, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Information Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here