Tacit knowledge in rock construction work: A study and a critique of the use of the term

Styhre, A (2009) Tacit knowledge in rock construction work: A study and a critique of the use of the term. Construction Management and Economics, 27(10), pp. 995-1003. ISSN 1466433X

Abstract

Tacit knowledge is one of the perennial issues of discussion in both the knowledge management and construction management literature. Being by definition that which cannot be properly explained in existing operative vocabularies, tacit knowledge is a residual category in prescribed analytical frameworks in the knowledge management literature. However, knowledge that is not easily explained verbally or in written form plays a decisive role in the construction industry. For instance, in the case of rock construction work, the most skilled construction workers are capable of carrying out certain procedures without fully mastering accompanying operative vocabularies, thereby demonstrating the capacity to use what has been called aesthetic knowledge, a specific form of tacit knowledge recognizing the limits of verbal and written communication. Aesthetic knowledge is an emergent competence residing in everyday practices and is therefore capable of transcending operative vocabularies. In practical terms, both managers and practitioners should pay attention to the importance of tacit knowledge and aesthetic knowledge and construction companies should seek to provide arenas where tacit and aesthetic knowledge should be shared effectively.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: aesthetic knowledge; rock construction work; tacit knowledge
Index terms: critique, aesthetic, operative, construction worker, vocabularies, construction industry, construction work, construction company, manager, knowledge management, analytical framework, tacit knowledge, practitioner, competence
Subjects: organization, evaluation and assessment methods, practitioner, operations management, knowledge organization and systems, data analysis and analytics, factor and component analysis, professional development, personnel development, industry analysis
Topics: Design Practice, Human Resources, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Information Management, Project Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here