Van Mossel, H J and Straub, A (2009) The need for customizing maintenance services in social housing. Construction Management and Economics, 27(2), pp. 135-151. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
Market segmentation theory is based on the notion that although customers are unique they may be grouped into relatively homogeneous categories which respond in a certain manner to the supplier's marketing efforts. Despite the lack of commercial necessity for the Dutch social rented sector in meeting the demands of tenants, public objectives do compel housing associations to be efficient and effective in maintenance spending. Through customization of maintenance service delivery, the match between users' expectations and the results of maintenance may be improved. Given the limited body of knowledge with respect to preferences of target groups in maintenance of dwellings a post hoc approach is used for this purpose. A large-scale survey was conducted among tenants of large housing associations in the Netherlands. By means of respectively principal component and cluster analyses, customer segments were given shape. Profiling of these segments was achieved through ANOVA and chi-square analyses. There seem to be grounds for housing associations to differentiate, to a limited degree, in their maintenance (purchasing) policy. This, however, always depends on the applicable strategic objectives of the housing association in question.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cluster analysis; housing associations; maintenance; service quality |
| Index terms: | social housing, marketing, purchasing, customization, service delivery, preference, body of knowledge, housing association, cluster analysis, service quality, Netherlands, tenant, survey, customizing, large housing |
| Subjects: | data analysis and analytics, knowledge management, institutional client, construction manufacturing, practitioner, data collection methods, business, procurement strategy, housing and residential development, Geography, service delivery, performance measurement, economic development, decision-making and reasoning |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Procurement, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Urban Studies, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here