Multi-criteria decision analysis in building maintainability using analytical hierarchy process

Das, S; Chew, M Y L and Poh, K L (2010) Multi-criteria decision analysis in building maintainability using analytical hierarchy process. Construction Management and Economics, 28(10), pp. 1043-1056. ISSN 1466433X

Abstract

A building maintainability (BM) approach is the only plausible solution to balance a decreasing budget and increasing standards of modern commercial buildings. There is no decision-analysis framework for BM management while many objective and subjective parameters add to its complexity and hinder direct comparison of various building systems contributing to overall BM. A model was developed to compare nine major building systems, namely: basement, facade, wet area, roof, sanitary plumbing, HVAC, elevator, electrical and fire protection system. Analytical hierarchy process was chosen to address complex BM parameters. From a questionnaire survey and face-to-face interviews with 37 experts in facilities management, BM was found to depend on technical viability of services and business profile controlled by building height and location respectively. For various location-height combinations, individual sets of priorities were derived for each building system and the results were supported logically. HVAC was the highest contributor to BM followed by elevator and facade. The proposed generic method can be directly applied to both new and existing commercial buildings in Singapore and extended to other building types or climate. This precise but simple platform for multi-criteria decision analysis promises higher BM and economic returns for any commercial property.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: analytical hierarchy process; building maintainability; commercial property; decision analysis; facilities management
Index terms: survey, face, maintainability, interview, complexity, facilities management, questionnaire, commercial property, commercial building, building height, decision analysis, platform, Singapore, analytical hierarchy process, roof, multi-criteria decision analysis, plumbing, building system
Subjects: data collection methods, construction type, mechanical systems, engineering systems, psychology, management, design practice, maintenance engineering, Geography, digital design, building performance, decision analysis, decision-making and optimization, systems engineering
Topics: Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Risk Management, Construction Technology, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here