El-Sheikh, A and Pryke, S D (2010) Network gaps and project success. Construction Management and Economics, 28(12), pp. 1205-1217. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
Project success and client satisfaction are results of collaborative actions by project actors throughout the entire project life cycle. One principal factor in project success is the application of effective management tools. Gap analysis helps to achieve client satisfaction. However, gap analysis is unable to deal with the organic nature of information exchange between project actors. Social network analysis (SNA) enables the identification and analysis of information exchange and communication patterns in synergy with projects. Two case studies were carried out to identify gaps in the current linear project management approach. Gap analysis and SNA were used to analyse each project and to examine the research hypothesis on the use of SNA to identify network management gaps in projects. The gap analysis showed gaps of execution and conformance, which were confirmed by SNA. There was little evidence of project governance outside the project contractual arrangements during project execution. The current application approach of different management tools is limited in providing a whole-project view. The combined application of gap analysis and SNA can help practitioners to exceed client expectations.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | client satisfaction; gap analysis; project management; social network analysis |
| Index terms: | synergy, case study, client satisfaction, gap analysis, information exchange, practitioner, governance, social network analysis, project management, life cycle, project success, evidence |
| Subjects: | project management theory and practice, practitioner, research methods, performance measurement, business, value management, client relations, data collection methods, partnership management, data science, evaluation and assessment methods |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Governance, Project Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here