Simulating the impact of supply chain management practice on the performance of medium-sized building projects

Hatmoko, J U D and Scott, S (2010) Simulating the impact of supply chain management practice on the performance of medium-sized building projects. Construction Management and Economics, 28(1), pp. 35-49. ISSN 1466433X

Abstract

Construction supply chains encompass the flows of materials, labour, information, plant, equipment and temporary works that originate from a variety of different parties. The impact of various supply chain management practices on project performance has been measured, through a combination of a survey and the development of simulation models. Preliminary investigations were carried out by visiting two medium-sized building projects regularly over a period of six months to gain an understanding of the ways in which delays on supply chains impact on project performance. This was followed by the main survey which was designed to collect data required for developing the simulation models. These models were developed using Pertmaster Risk Expert™ software and incorporated supply chain delays applied to a CPM network of a typical medium-sized building project of 300 days' duration. The results of the simulation showed that the project's median delay was 67 days (22% of the project duration). The use of subcontractors in the project reduced this delay by approximately 45%. It was also learned that delays in material flow caused the biggest impact on the project, followed by labour flow, information flow and 'plant, equipment and temporary work' flow. These findings are an important measure of how much supply chain delays impact on project performance.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: project performance; risk; simulation; supply chain delays; supply chain management
Index terms: construction supply chain, project performance, temporary work, investigation, duration, management practice, subcontractor, information flow, survey
Subjects: data collection methods, practitioner, construction logistics, operations management, management, project management theory and practice, project controls, information systems
Topics: Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy, Time Control, Site Management, Supply Chain Management, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here