Jaillon, L and Poon, C S (2010) Design issues of using prefabrication in Hong Kong building construction. Construction Management and Economics, 28(10), pp. 1025-1042. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
Prefabrication techniques have been adopted for the last two decades in public housing projects in Hong Kong, but the use of prefabrication in the private sector was encouraged only after the implementation of the Joint Practices Notes which promote its use. Although previous studies acknowledge the environmental benefits of using prefabrication, only a few studies have addressed sustainable design concepts (closed-loop) in the adoption of precast construction. A questionnaire survey was administered to experienced Hong Kong construction professionals, and case studies of recently completed building projects were compiled to ascertain the use of prefabrication with reference to life cycle approach. The findings revealed that prefabrication, combined with modular design and standard components, saved time and construction/design costs, as buildings systems were used across projects. However, in some projects, specific site conditions restricted the use of similar prefabricated building systems across projects. Surprisingly only a few participants addressed life cycle design concepts such as design for deconstruction when adopting precast construction. Also, although it is common knowledge that flexible and demountable prefabricated building systems would result in efficient use of resources, their use is seldom practised in Hong Kong.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | hong kong; life cycle design; precast concrete; prefabrication; sustainable construction |
| Index terms: | questionnaire, building construction, survey, sustainable construction, sustainable design, implementation, prefabrication, prefabricated building, construction professional, modular design, public housing, precast concrete, life cycle, private sector, design cost, Hong Kong, case study |
| Subjects: | value management, design methods, construction type, data collection methods, contractual arrangements, building materials, Geography, design process, sustainable construction, professional development, economics, industry analysis, building construction |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Procurement, Construction Technology, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Construction Materials, Information Management, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here