Jarkas, A M (2010) The influence of buildability factors on rebar fixing labour productivity of beams. Construction Management and Economics, 28(5), pp. 527-543. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
Buildability is one of the most important factors affecting construction labour productivity. Nonetheless, an extensive search of the literature revealed a dearth of research into its effects on in situ reinforced concrete construction, especially at the rebar fixing trade level. Buildability factors affecting rebar fixing labour productivity of major structural elements, such as foundations, columns, walls, beams and slabs, are yet to be investigated and quantified. In comparison with the other constituents of the reinforced concrete frame, rebar fixing in beams is one of the most labour-intensive and time-consuming activities, therefore, the objective of this research is to quantify the effects and relative influence of buildability factors on fixing labour productivity of beams. To achieve this objective, a large volume of productivity data was collected and analysed using the categorical interaction-regression method. As a result, the effects of the variability of beam sizes, rebar diameter, stirrups diameter, reinforcement quantity, beam dimensions, and span geometry are determined. The findings show a significant influence of these factors on the labour efficiency of the fixing operation, which may be used to provide designers and construction managers with feedback on how well the designs of this activity consider the requirements of buildability, and the consequences of designers' decisions on the labour productivity of the operation. In addition, a set of recommendations are presented, which upon implementation, can improve the buildability level of this activity, thus translate into higher labour productivity and more efficient utilization of resources.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | buildability; characteristic bar diameter; labour productivity; rebar fixing; reinforced concrete beams |
| Index terms: | designer, reinforced concrete beam, productivity, geometry, stirrup, efficiency, variability, foundations, dimension, implementation, interaction, labour productivity, rebar, construction labour, in-situ, reinforcement, beam, column, buildability, reinforced concrete construction, reinforced concrete, construction manager |
| Subjects: | profession, mathematical modelling, building materials, contractual arrangements, health monitoring assessment and metrics, structural engineering, management, performance management, building construction, design efficiency, statistical analysis, behavioral psychology |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Construction Materials, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Procurement, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Quality Management, Design Practice, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here