Kokkaew, N and Chiara, N (2010) Modelling completion risk using stochastic critical path-envelope method: A BOT highway project application. Construction Management and Economics, 28(12), pp. 1239-1254. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
In integrated project delivery methods such as build-operate-transfer (BOT), a thorough financial risk analysis model should incorporate completion risk analysis into operation risk analysis as the timing of financial events such as refinancing and debt servicing depend on the construction completion date. During construction, project managers always have opportunities to react to negative events and to take corrective actions whenever possible to recover late-running schedules. These opportunities to react are 'real options' embedded in the construction process. However, current models of completion risk analysis ignore this feature of project managers. A reliable construction completion risk model for project feasibility studies should capture a manager's option to react to unforeseen, negative events. A novel approach for modelling construction completion risk analysis is developed by combining stochastic critical path method with the envelope method (SCP-EM). The SCP-EM approach can model the option-like feature of management feedback reactions in a straightforward fashion. The proposed approach, if applied correctly during the project feasibility study stage, enhances the project finance risk model by helping analysts properly evaluate financial risk arising from completion delay.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | build-operate-transfer; envelope method; monte carlo simulation; project scheduling; risk analysis |
| Index terms: | build-operate-transfer, project feasibility, critical path, project finance, highway construction, risk analysis, manager, integrated project delivery, project scheduling, option, real option, critical path method, modelling, project manager, construction process, servicing, Monte Carlo simulation |
| Subjects: | analytical methods, building construction, economic analysis, civil engineering, financial management, operations research, value management, maintenance engineering, profession, project controls, modelling and simulation, contractual arrangements, environmental hazards, practitioner, decision analysis |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Procurement, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Time Control, Site Management, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here