Whole life costing of domestic energy demand reduction technologies: Householder perspectives

Pellegrini-Masini, G; Bowles, G; Peacock, A D; Ahadzi, M and Banfill, P F G (2010) Whole life costing of domestic energy demand reduction technologies: Householder perspectives. Construction Management and Economics, 28(3), pp. 217-229. ISSN 1466433X

Abstract

A recent, major UK research project investigated technical and social aspects of reducing the CO2 emissions of UK domestic housing by 50% by the year 2030. As 80% of the UK housing stock that will be present in 2030 has already been built, this study aimed to research the whole life costs of three sets of energy demand reduction technologies for existing housing, over a 25-year period, suitable to deliver significant CO2 emissions reduction up to 50%. Demand side technological interventions in the form of fabric upgrades and ventilation systems are identified. Whole life cycle analysis of interventions carried out on two housing variants prominent in the domestic stock under different energy price scenarios is carried out using discounted cash flow and compared with the do-nothing option. The results show that, despite reducing annual energy bills, there is no clear financial case even over a 25-year horizon for householders to invest in the proposed interventions that contribute to CO2 emission reduction targets. When discussed with respect to household income and consumption preferences, the results reveal the need for new policy approaches to overcome the financial and non-financial hurdles for a mass uptake of energy efficient technologies.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: energy consumption; energy efficiency; housing; whole life costing
Index terms: preference, consumption, whole-life costing, housing, social aspect, housing stock, whole life cost, discounted cash flow, ventilation, option, energy consumption, income, household, energy efficiency, CO2 emissions, energy demand, whole life cycle
Subjects: economic analysis, energy systems, sustainability and energy, consumer economics, air quality, construction type, financial analysis, industry analysis, occupational health, decision analysis, sociology, demography, decision-making and reasoning, sustainability assessment
Topics: Urban Studies, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Sustainability, Construction Technology
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here