Smyth, H (2010) Construction industry performance improvement programmes: The UK case of demonstration projects in the 'continuous improvement' programme. Construction Management and Economics, 28(3), pp. 255-270. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
There has been a range of initiatives across many countries over the last 10 to 15 years to introduce reform to the construction process in order to improve performance. The so-called UK 'Continuous Improvement' programme is evaluated as a case study through an analysis of demonstration projects. These projects symbolically represent best practice for others to follow directly in the UK and through influence indirectly in other countries. This raises methodological challenges, yet the scant empirical attention given to this field justifies such attention. The main conclusion is that there have been improvements, yet these seem not to have been continuous. Contractors are distant from direct value creation, increasingly relying upon others in the supply chain. Improvement measures have not penetrated most supply chains. This suggests that contractors need to develop learning and competency capacity; especially stakeholder management and/or clients need to identify new solution providers. There has been little direct evidence of this and the current environment is placing emphasis upon price rather than value. Capacity and capabilities for continuous improvement appear largely transient and insufficiently embedded to persist where present.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | demonstration projects; investment; knowledge transfer management; performance improvement |
| Index terms: | programme, stakeholder management, construction process, knowledge transfer, value creation, evidence, continuous improvement, case study, construction industry performance, best practice, performance improvement, placing |
| Subjects: | business, research dissemination and communication, data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, participation process, performance measurement, concrete and cementitious materials, economic development, building construction, project controls, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Digital Applications, Site Management, Time Control, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here