Chandra, V and Loosemore, M (2011) Communicating about organizational culture in the briefing process: Case study of a hospital project. Construction Management and Economics, 29(3), pp. 223-231. ISSN 1466433X
Abstract
A new hospital building represents a rare opportunity to align the physical environment of healthcare with contemporary healthcare needs and models of healthcare delivery to help ensure optimal health outcomes. The effectiveness of interaction between project stakeholders from the hospital and design teams during the briefing process of any hospital project is critical in ensuring this alignment occurs. Therefore it is important to explore the process of knowledge sharing during this project briefing stage. Using thematic content analysis to explore communication exchanges between these project stakeholders, we show that knowledge exchanged during the briefing process is acquired not only explicitly but implicitly through social processes whereby participants attempt to socially construct a common understanding of the project. In particular, the importance of constructive conflict in driving this process is critical. This has implications for health planners, project managers, facilities managers and health professions engaged in the briefing process of hospital projects. In particular, it highlights the importance of providing the correct environment and enough time for culturally conducive social interaction and knowledge sharing to occur between the many stakeholders involved.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | briefing; conflict; culture; facilities management; hospitals; knowledge; stakeholders |
| Index terms: | project stakeholder, facilities manager, organizational culture, briefing, project briefing, facilities management, knowledge sharing, content analysis, design team, effectiveness, planner, social process, profession, social interaction, interaction, project manager, case study |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, profession, scope management, practitioner, institututions, professional practice, data analysis and analytics, knowledge management, performance management, management, sociology, behavioral psychology, communities and social development |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Quality Management, Design Practice, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here