Contingency estimating using option pricing theory: Closing the gap between theory and practice

Espinoza, R D (2011) Contingency estimating using option pricing theory: Closing the gap between theory and practice. Construction Management and Economics, 29(9), pp. 913-927. ISSN 1466433X

Abstract

Valuation of contingency budgets for construction projects considering technical and market uncertainties as well as the time it takes to execute the project can be estimated using option pricing theory. Although option pricing theory provides an attractive framework for calculation of contingency budgets, it typically results in complex highly non-linear partial differential equations that require the use of numerical algorithms and computer intensive techniques, thus making it difficult for practitioners to adopt this valuation technique. An attempt to bridge the gap between theory and practice is made by proposing an equivalent linear stochastic process to model the complex non-linear random variation with time of the technical and market uncertainty for projects. The approximation allows estimation of contingency budgets using either closedform solutions for pricing options, or the intuitive binomial approach. To validate the proposed equivalent linear solution, its results were compared to the solution to the non-linear partial differential equation that governs the pricing of contingency budgets solved by Monte Carlo simulations. A parametric study of the error shows that the proposed approximation to estimate contingency budgets compares well with the results obtained from simulation. The main advantages of the proposed solution are its simplicity and straightforward implementation.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: contingency cost; decision analysis; real options
Index terms: estimation, Monte Carlo simulation, decision analysis, pricing, option, estimate, real option, implementation, partial differential equation, estimating, practitioner, construction project, variation
Subjects: decision analysis, production management, contractual condition, financial and cost management, economic analysis, contractual arrangements, modelling and simulation, practitioner, mathematical modelling
Topics: Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Contract Administration
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here